SAProfession-specific standardsالدورات
Ethics and Ethical Standards for Doctors in Saudi Arabia
Medical ethics course for doctors in Saudi Arabia covering consent for minors, confidentiality, DNR decisions, honest sick leave and company gifts. For SCFHS-registered physicians; ends with a certificate and reflective account.
- 3hours of learning
- 10sections
- 20final questions
- 80%pass mark
- Online and self-paced, on any device
- Reflective account template
- Knowledge checks in every section
- Certificate the day you pass
Which of these is your situation?
- Consent questionedA procedure on a minor, an adult without capacity or a patient who later says they did not agree.
- Information sharedA relative, employer or insurer was told something the patient had not agreed to.
- DNR disputeA family challenges a do-not-resuscitate decision or how it was explained.
- Sick leave or reportA certificate, sick leave or medical report is said to be inaccurate.
- Gifts or referralsCompany hospitality, a referral arrangement or steering patients to a private clinic.
- Online postA clip, photograph or advert on social media has been reported through 937.
- Colleague or traineeSupervision of a resident, criticism of a colleague or a concern you did not raise.
- Committee or panelYour case has been referred to the Violations Committee or the Sharia Health Panel.
- Renewal CPDNo concern: you want structured ethics learning before SCFHS re-registration.
At a glance
- Who it is for
- Physicians registered with SCFHS and licensed by MOH: general practitioners, residents, specialists and consultants in government and private practice
- Laws and codes
- Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions (M/59, 1426H) and its Executive Regulations; SCFHS Code of Ethics for Healthcare Practitioners; MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent (2019); national DNR policy (2017); Personal Data Protection Law
- Complaint routes covered
- 937 and the facility route, investigation under Article 40, the Committee for Violations of the Law, the Sharia Health Panel and appeals to the Board of Grievances
- Format
- Online and self-paced in 10 sections, with Saudi hospital and clinic cases and a six-step decision method
- Assessment
- A knowledge check after each section and a 20-question scenario-based final assessment; pass mark 80%
- Certificate
- Dated certificate of completion with the course title, learning hours and a unique certificate ID
- Best taken with
- Professionalism and Professional Standards for Doctors if you want both halves of physician conduct; the Health Violations Committee course if your case is before a committee
- Learning time
- 3 hours of learning, self-paced online on any device, with 12 months of access. Your progress is saved to your account.
- Price
- SAR 279 for one course. Savings apply automatically in the cart when you buy several.
In short
A physician in the Kingdom answers to three layers of rules at once: the Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions and its Executive Regulations, the SCFHS Code of Ethics for Healthcare Practitioners, and national policy from MOH and the Saudi Health Council. Many questions that feel purely ethical, such as who signs consent for a 16-year-old, what a relative may be told, who recommends a DNR order or whether a company dinner is acceptable, already have a written answer in one of them. This course teaches those answers for physicians, gives you a six-step method for the cases the rules do not settle, and shows how the same standards are used when a complaint reaches the facility, 937 or a committee. It closes with a structured reflection and an action plan you can keep as evidence.
What you will learn
- Apply Article 19 and the MOH 2019 consent guidelines, including minors, guardians and emergencies.
- Share patient information only on the lawful grounds in Article 21 and the PDPL.
- Explain the three-physician DNR process and what care continues under the national policy.
- Issue certificates, sick leave and records that are accurate and honest.
- Refuse prohibited company benefits, referral commissions and unlawful self-promotion.
- Respond to a complaint with honesty and write an evidenced reflective action plan.
Course overview
Many ethical choices a physician makes in Saudi Arabia are also legal ones. Who signs consent for a 16-year-old, who may recommend a DNR order, when a relative may be told a diagnosis, whether a company's gift is lawful and how many days of sick leave you can honestly certify are all answered by the Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions, the SCFHS Code of Ethics or national MOH and Saudi Health Council policy. This course works through each of them with Saudi cases and a clear method for reaching and recording decisions.
It is for residents, specialists and consultants registered with SCFHS and licensed by MOH, in government and private settings. Doctors new to the Kingdom will see where Saudi rules differ from those they trained under, and doctors responding to a complaint or investigation can use it to understand the standard in question and reflect on it. A knowledge check follows each section, and the course ends with a 20-question scenario assessment and a written action plan.
Who this course is for
SCFHS-registered, MOH-licensed physicians: residents, specialists and consultants.
- Physicians responding to a patient complaint
A complaint through 937 or the patient relations route says consent was not obtained, information was disclosed or a family was not told the truth. You need to show that you understand the exact standard, not only that you are sorry it happened.
- Doctors under investigation or before a committee
Your facility or the regional health affairs directorate has opened an investigation, or the case has gone to the Violations Committee or the Sharia Health Panel. The course explains the rules each body applies and how insight and change are shown.
- General practitioners and family physicians
Sick leave requests, families asking you to keep a diagnosis from an elderly parent and patients who expect a referral to a particular clinic are routine in primary care. The course gives you the written rules and a way to record your reasoning.
- Hospital specialists and consultants
Consent for interventional procedures, DNR recommendations with two colleagues, conversations with large families and supervision of residents all sit with you. The cases are drawn from wards, theatres and outpatient clinics across the Kingdom.
- Residents and Saudi Board trainees
You are learning to take consent, write reports and present cases while still supervised. The lessons on teaching on patients, honest training records and asking for help set out what is expected of you now.
- Physicians who trained outside Saudi Arabia
If you qualified in South Asia, Egypt, Sudan, Jordan, Europe or elsewhere, some Saudi rules will be new: written consent for interventional procedures, joint consent from 15 to 18, the three-physician DNR process and strict limits on self-promotion.
- Doctors in private clinics and polyclinics
Private practice brings fee discussions, insurance claims, marketing and referral relationships closer to clinical decisions. The course shows where Articles 10, 12 and 14 of the Law draw the line.
- Physicians preparing for re-registration
You want a focused, assessed ethics course with a certificate and reflection for your portfolio before your two-year SCFHS registration is renewed.
The concerns this course addresses
Consent for minors, guardians and adults who lack capacity
Article 19 of the Law forbids medical intervention without consent, and the MOH guidelines add the detail physicians are judged on: adulthood at 18, guardian consent under 15, joint consent of the minor and guardian from 15 to 18, written signed consent for surgery, anaesthesia and interventional procedures, and emergency treatment only when two specialist physicians agree and document it. Complaints often follow a procedure done on a teenager with only a parent's signature, or a consent form signed weeks earlier for something different.
Law Art. 19 and Reg. 1-19; MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent (2019); SCFHS Code Ch. 2
Telling relatives, employers or insurers too much
The medical file is confidential and open only to the treating team, the patient and authorised bodies. Disclosure is allowed in narrow cases such as notifiable disease, crime, a judicial order or the patient's written consent. Families in the Kingdom often expect to be told first, and employers and insurers ask for detail. Health data is also sensitive data under the PDPL, so a careless message on a phone can breach several rules at once.
Law Art. 21 and Reg. 1-21; SCFHS Code Ch. 2 and Ch. 9; PDPL
DNR decisions and end-of-life conversations
Under the national DNR policy a DNR order is recommended and signed by the attending consultant and two other physicians of at least specialist level, it is reviewed at least every six months for inpatients, and all other care continues. Complaints usually arise when a family feels the decision was hidden from them, rushed, or treated as a decision to stop caring.
Saudi Health Council national DNR policy (1438H/2017); SCFHS Code Ch. 15
Sick leave, medical reports and death certificates
Article 15 requires reports, sick leave and death certificates to follow the regulations, and Article 14 forbids false sick leave and reports. Pressure comes from patients, employers and sometimes colleagues. A certificate that cannot be supported by the clinical record is treated as an honesty issue, not a paperwork error.
Law Arts. 14, 15 and 20; SCFHS Code Ch. 3 and Ch. 9
Company benefits, referral fees and private clinics
Article 12 bars commissions for steering patients to pharmacies, laboratories or hospitals and benefits from drug or device companies. The SCFHS Code adds rules on gifts, sponsored travel, disclosure of financial interests and private work that draws public patients into private practice. These breaches carry fines of up to SAR 50,000 under Article 29.
Law Arts. 12 and 29; SCFHS Code Ch. 10
Self-promotion, patient images and social media
Article 10 and Regulation 9-1 restrict self-advertising and promotion without a scientific basis, and Regulation 3-5 requires the patient's written consent and facility approval before procedures are photographed or published. MOH releases from 2024 to 2026 describe suspensions and referrals of practitioners over clips, patient images and unsupported product claims.
Law Art. 10, Regs. 3-5 and 9-1; SCFHS Code Ch. 10; MOH releases 2024-2026
Colleagues, supervision and teaching on patients
The SCFHS Code asks physicians not to criticise colleagues in front of patients, to raise concerns through proper channels, to report a colleague whose condition may endanger patients and to supervise trainees properly. Patients have a say in whether they are used for teaching. Concerns arise when a resident works beyond their competence or when a disagreement between doctors spills into the patient's room.
SCFHS Code Ch. 4 and Ch. 8; Law Art. 27
Honesty after something goes wrong
When an outcome is poor, the way you explain it to the patient and record it matters as much as the clinical facts. Changing a record after the event, giving the family a vague account or blaming another team are often treated more seriously than the original decision.
SCFHS Code Ch. 2 and Ch. 9; Law Arts. 15 and 18
Detailed course outline
10 sections · 23 lessons · 32 knowledge-check questions · 3 hours of learning
Ten sections move from the legal framework for physicians, through duties to patients, consent, confidentiality and end-of-life care, to honesty, money, colleagues, complaints and your own action plan. Every section closes with a short knowledge check.
-
1The legal and ethical framework for physicians in Saudi Arabia3 lessons · 3 checks
How the Law, its Executive Regulations, the SCFHS Code and MOH policy fit together; what classification, registration and the MOH licence oblige you to do; and a six-step method for ethical decisions in a Saudi setting.
- 1.1How the Law, the SCFHS Code and MOH policy fit togetherFour layers of obligation · The Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions · The SCFHS Code of Ethics
- 1.2Your registration, your licence and the duties attached to themClassification, registration and licensing · Working within your specialty · Duties that continue after registration
- 1.3Ethical principles and a method for reaching decisionsThe four principles in a Saudi setting · A six-step method
- Section 1 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 1.1
-
2Duties towards patients: care, honesty and communication2 lessons · 3 checks
Fair treatment without discrimination, emergency care before payment under Article 8, necessary rather than maximum care, not abandoning the patient, and how to explain a serious diagnosis when relatives ask you to hold back.
- 2.1Fair treatment, necessary care and not abandoning the patientWhat the Code asks of you · Emergency care before payment · Necessary care, not maximum care · Not abandoning the patient
- 2.2Explaining diagnosis and prognosis, and working with familiesThe right to know · A structure for serious news · When relatives ask you to hold back
- Section 2 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 2.1
-
3Informed consent under Article 19 and the MOH 2019 guidelines3 lessons · 4 checks
Valid consent under Article 19 and the MOH 2019 guidelines: written consent, adults and married women, minors under 15 and from 15 to 18, substitute decision-makers, emergencies, refusal and withdrawal.
- 3.1What makes consent validThe legal starting point · Conditions for valid consent · When consent must be written
- 3.2Who may consent: adults, women, minors and substitute decision-makersAdults · Minors · Adults who lack capacity · Married women and fertility
- 3.3Emergencies, refusal and withdrawal of consentTreating without consent in an emergency · When a capable patient refuses · Withdrawal of consent
- Section 3 knowledge check4 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 3.1
-
4Confidentiality, patient data and the PDPL2 lessons · 3 checks
The duty of secrecy in Article 21, the lawful exceptions, the care team, families and visitors, insurers, messaging apps and photographs, and the PDPL rules on sensitive health data.
- 4.1The duty of secrecy and when disclosure is lawfulThe core duty · When disclosure is allowed · Within the care team
- 4.2Families, insurers, messaging apps and personal data lawThe Personal Data Protection Law · Families and visitors · Insurers · Social media and photographs
- Section 4 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 4.1
-
5End-of-life care and do-not-resuscitate decisions2 lessons · 3 checks
The national DNR policy: who recommends and signs, which patients it is meant for, review periods, what care continues, and how to hold and record conversations with families who disagree.
- 5.1The national DNR policy: who decides and what it coversWhat a DNR order is · Who decides · What a DNR order does not mean
- 5.2Conversations with families, disagreement and continuing careWho is told, and how · A framework for the conversation · When disagreement persists · Documentation
- Section 5 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 5.1
-
6Honest certificates, reports and records2 lessons · 3 checks
Medical reports, sick leave and death certificates under Articles 14, 15 and 20; accurate records, prescriptions and corrections; and the patient's right to see and copy the record.
- 6.1Medical reports, sick leave and death certificatesWhat the rules say · Where the pressure comes from · Death certification
- 6.2Accurate records and prescriptionsRecords · Prescriptions · The patient's access to the record
- Section 6 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 6.1
-
7Gifts, money and conflicts of interest3 lessons · 4 checks
Relationships with pharmaceutical and device companies, gifts and samples, fees and private practice, referral incentives, insurance claims, and the advertising and social media rules MOH enforces.
- 7.1Relationships with pharmaceutical and device companiesThe legal line · What the SCFHS Code allows and forbids · Samples and representatives
- 7.2Fees, referrals, private practice and insurance claimsFees and transparency · Private work alongside public duties · Referral incentives · Insurance claims
- 7.3Advertising, self-promotion and social mediaThe rules · What MOH enforcement shows
- Section 7 knowledge check4 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 7.1
-
8Colleagues, supervision and teaching2 lessons · 3 checks
Duties to colleagues under Chapter 4 of the SCFHS Code, raising concerns, consultations and second opinions, and supervision and teaching on patients for consultants, specialists and residents.
- 8.1Duties towards professional colleaguesWhat the Code asks · Raising a concern about care · Consultations and second opinions
- 8.2Consultants, specialists and residents: supervision and teaching on patientsSupervision as an ethical duty · Teaching and learning on patients · Being honest as a trainee
- Section 8 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 8.1
-
9When things go wrong: complaints, investigation and accountability2 lessons · 3 checks
How a concern travels from 937 or the facility to an investigation, the Violations Committee or the Sharia Health Panel; the penalties in the Law; and how to respond with honesty, apology and insight.
- 9.1From a complaint to the Sharia Health Panel or the Violations CommitteeHow concerns arrive · The investigation · Penalties
- 9.2Responding with honesty, insight and learningThe first days · Writing your statement · Apology and honesty · Insight and remediation
- Section 9 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 9.1
-
10Reflection and personal action planning2 lessons · 3 checks
A self-review against every chapter of the course, a reflective model, and a personal action plan with review dates and the evidence you will keep.
- 10.1Reviewing your practice against the courseA quick self-review · Using a reflective model · Being honest with yourself
- 10.2Your personal action planWriting good actions · Reviewing your plan · Keeping the evidence
- Section 10 knowledge check3 scenario questions with feedback on every answer
- 10.1
- Final assessment: 20 scenario-based questions, 80% to passthen your certificate
Knowledge checks, final assessment and certificate
Knowledge checks
32questions across the sections
- A short check at the end of every section
- Feedback that explains why each answer is right or wrong
- Use them to find gaps before the final assessment
Final assessment
20scenario-based questions
- Pass mark 80%: 16 correct out of 20
- Tests whether you can apply the rules, not recall a page
- Not passed yet? Review the sections and retake it
What the final scenarios test
- Who may consent for a minor when the guardian is not present
- Gifts from companies and patients steered to a private clinic
- Patient photographs online and titles you may not use
- What care continues under a DNR order and re-registration rules
Certificate of completion
A dated certificate of completion for your learning portfolio. It records the course, the hours of learning and your result; SCFHS decides how any learning counts towards your registration.
- Your name, the course title and the hours of learning
- Completion date and a unique certificate ID that can be verified
- Ready to download as a PDF as soon as you complete the course
How practitioners use it
- Evidence of focused ethics learning in a response to your facility, an MOH investigation or a committee, placed next to your written reflection rather than instead of it.
- Material for your malpractice insurer or lawyer when they prepare a statement or a submission for the Sharia Health Panel.
- A record for your CPD portfolio before re-registration, with your notes on what you changed; SCFHS decides how any learning counts.
- Proof for a head of department or medical director that you completed learning agreed after a workplace concern.
- A structured starting point for supervision or mentoring conversations about consent, confidentiality and end-of-life decisions.
Your reflective account template
The course includes a structured reflective account template: guided prompts to record what you learned, how you will apply it and how the change will show in your practice. It gives you written evidence of insight after a concern, and a ready record for your CPD portfolio.
The final section asks you to review your practice against each chapter of the course with a reflective model, then write specific actions with review dates and the evidence you will keep.
Write it in your own words and leave out anything that could identify a patient, a colleague or a case. If you have an open complaint or case, talk to your adviser before reflecting on it in writing.
Three layers of rules: how Saudi law turns medical ethics into enforceable duties
In many countries medical ethics is taught as principle and regulated through a professional code. In Saudi Arabia a large part of it is written into statute. The Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions, issued by Royal Decree No. M/59 in 1426H, and its Executive Regulations set out duties on consent, confidentiality, certificates, advertising, referral fees and emergency care, with fines and disciplinary penalties attached. The SCFHS Code of Ethics for Healthcare Practitioners sits beside the Law and covers the wider ground: duties to patients, the community, colleagues and the profession, documentation, money, research and serious illness. National policies such as the MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent and the Saudi Health Council's DNR policy then give the procedural detail a physician is expected to follow on the ward.
The layers overlap deliberately. Taking consent from a 16-year-old's father alone is a departure from the MOH guidelines, a breach of the consent duty in Article 19 and a failure under the Code's chapter on duties to patients. Accepting a paid trip from a company is a Code issue on gifts and a breach of Article 12. Publishing a theatre clip without written consent breaches Regulation 3-5, the Code's rules on patient images and, where health data is involved, the PDPL. When MOH or a committee looks at a case, it is common for several of these to be cited together.
The layers also depend on your registration. SCFHS classification and registration are a precondition for the MOH licence under Article 2, and registration has to be renewed every two years. A licence covers a specialty, and Article 9 forbids work outside it except in emergencies. Ethical duties are therefore tied to the scope of practice written on your licence, which is why doctors who drift into procedures they are not classified for face both a competence question and a legal one.
Principles still matter, because the rules do not settle every case. A capable adult refuses a transfusion; a family asks you not to tell their mother she has cancer; a consultant you respect wants a resident to operate unsupervised. The Code points towards respect for the patient, benefit, avoidance of harm and fairness, framed within Islamic values, but it does not weigh them for you. A structured method closes that gap: establish the facts, identify who is affected, name the principles in tension, find the rule that applies, list the options and record why you chose one.
When a concern is raised, the same structure frames what the investigating body wants to know. It will ask what happened, which duty applied, what the effect was on the patient and what you have done since. A physician who can name the article or chapter, explain why it exists and show a specific change in practice gives the reader a reason to conclude the risk has been dealt with. A physician who answers only with good intentions leaves that question open.
How to respond to a complaint about this kind of concern
A complaint about consent, confidentiality or honesty can feel like an attack on your character. It is more useful to treat it as a request for a clear account of one event and of what has changed since. These steps keep your response factual and complete.
Take advice before you write anything
Speak to your malpractice insurer, your facility's legal or medical affairs office or a lawyer. Note any deadline in the letter and ask early if you need more time. If the matter may go to the Sharia Health Panel, advice matters even more.
In the course: Section 9 explains the investigation and the bodies involved, so you know what your adviser is preparing you for.
Find the exact rule that applied
Identify which article of the Law, which regulation, which chapter of the SCFHS Code or which MOH policy covers the event, and read it in full rather than in summary.
In the course: Sections 1 to 7 set out each rule with its source, from Article 19 on consent to Article 12 on company benefits.
Name the ethical question underneath
Was it the patient's choice against what you thought was best, confidentiality against a family's expectations, or loyalty to a colleague against the patient's safety? Saying so plainly shows you understand why the rule exists.
In the course: Section 1 gives you the principles and the six-step method to set the question out.
Write a factual account and own your part
Describe what happened, when, your role and what you did, without identifying the patient in documents that do not need it, without blaming others and without long justification. Acknowledge the effect on the patient and the family.
In the course: Section 9 covers writing a statement, apology and honesty after harm.
Show what has changed, with evidence
List the specific changes to your practice, when they started and how you know they work. Attach what you can: a revised consent checklist, audit results, supervision notes or a certificate with your reflection.
In the course: Section 10 helps you write actions with dates, measures and the evidence you will keep.
This page is general information, not legal advice. Before you answer your facility, MOH, the Violations Committee or the Sharia Health Panel, speak to your malpractice insurer, your facility's legal office or a lawyer.
How this course helps with a complaint or investigation
It ties each duty to its source
Many responses say a doctor now understands the importance of consent. Few say which article or guideline applied, what it requires and why it protects patients. The course teaches that link, so your reflection reads as understanding rather than recital.
It gives you a method you can show
The six-step decision method produces a short written record of how you reasoned. Using it on the event in question, and on new cases afterwards, is concrete evidence that your decision-making has changed.
It structures your reflection
The final section takes you through what happened, what you thought and felt, what the standard required, what you learned and what you now do differently. That order suits a statement to your facility, an investigation or a committee.
It separates what persuades from what does not
Remediation carries weight when it matches the cause: learning for a knowledge gap, supervision for judgement, a changed process for a system failure. The course shows how to choose and evidence each.
Remediation evidence that carries weight
Carries weight
- A reflection in your own words that names the rule that applied, why it exists and the effect on the patient
- A written decision record, using a structured method, for at least one comparable case since the event
- A revised consent, disclosure or certificate checklist with anonymised examples of it in use
- An audit of your own consent forms or sick leave certificates over a set period, with the results
- Notes from supervision or mentoring with a senior colleague in which difficult cases were discussed
- Feedback from your head of department describing changed practice over time
- Learning matched to the specific gap, with notes on how you applied it
Carries little weight
- A list of certificates with no link to the concern
- Statements that you have always been an ethical doctor
- Long quotations from the Law or the Code without applying them to the event
- Arguments that the patient or family was difficult or ungrateful
- Saying that other doctors in the department do the same
- Promises to be more careful that are not tied to any change
- General reflection that could fit any complaint about any doctor
A remediation plan, phase by phase
Weeks 1-2
Advice, facts and the right rule
- Contact your malpractice insurer or a lawyer and note every deadline.
- Write a private chronology while your memory is fresh, from the record rather than recollection alone.
- Identify the article, regulation, Code chapter or MOH policy that applied and read it in full.
Weeks 2-6
Understand the ethics of the event
- Complete this course and note which sections the event engages.
- Apply the six-step method to the event in writing.
- Draft your reflective account and review it with your adviser before it goes anywhere.
Weeks 6-12
Change practice and show it
- Introduce the specific change the analysis points to, such as a consent checklist for minors or a disclosure note.
- Arrange regular discussion of difficult cases with a senior colleague who has no conflict in the matter.
- Collect anonymised examples of the change in use.
Months 3-12
Sustain and review
- Add an ethics goal to your CPD plan with a measure you can check.
- Audit a sample of your consent forms or certificates every quarter.
- Update your reflection at six months with what has worked and what has not.
Writing your reflective statement
Describe the event
Set out what happened, when, your role and the outcome, without identifying anyone.
Example only: As the treating orthopaedic specialist, I performed a knee arthroscopy on a 16-year-old after his father signed the consent form; I did not ask for the patient's own consent.
Name the principles in tension
Say which principles pulled against each other and how you weighed them at the time.
Example only: I gave weight to the father's authority and to avoiding delay, and almost none to the patient's right to take part in a decision about his own body.
Identify the standard
Name the article, guideline or Code chapter that applied and explain why it exists.
Example only: The MOH consent guidelines require both the minor and the guardian to consent from 15 to 18, because a young person of that age can understand the procedure and should have a voice.
Acknowledge the impact
Describe the effect on the patient, the family, your colleagues and trust in the service.
Example only: The patient felt the decision had been made over his head, and his complaint showed me how quickly trust in a whole department can be lost.
Explain what you learned
Say what you did not know, or had stopped applying, and how your understanding changed.
Example only: I had treated the age rules as a formality. I now understand them as a safeguard for the patient's dignity and as a legal requirement.
Describe the changes and how you keep them
List the specific changes, when they began and how they are checked.
Example only: Since March I use a consent checklist for every patient under 18, and our quality coordinator audits ten of my forms each quarter.
The example sentences are fictional and show structure only. Your statement has to be your own honest account.
A weak and a strong response, side by side
Illustrative case. A general practitioner in a private polyclinic in Jeddah issues five days' sick leave to a patient he saw for ten minutes with a mild sore throat, after the patient explains that his manager will not give him leave for a family matter. The employer queries the certificate and the clinic receives a complaint.
| Weak response | Strong response |
|---|---|
| The patient was clearly unwell and stressed, and I used my clinical judgement. Five days is not excessive and many doctors give more. The employer has no right to question a medical certificate. I have been a doctor for fifteen years and have never had a complaint. I will be more careful in future. | I issued five days' sick leave that the clinical findings in my record did not support, because I wanted to help the patient with a personal problem. Article 15 of the Law and Chapter 9 of the SCFHS Code require certificates to reflect the clinical facts, and Article 14 forbids false sick leave. Issuing it damaged the employer's trust in the clinic's certificates. I have read the rules again, completed this course, and I now record the findings that support every certificate and refer requests for non-medical leave back to the patient's employer. My medical director reviews a sample of my certificates each month. |
Why the second one works: The strong response states what was done and why, names the rules, accepts the effect on others and describes specific, checked changes. The weak response relies on clinical judgement without evidence, compares itself with other doctors, attacks the employer and offers only a promise, which suggests the same certificate could be issued again.
Mistakes practitioners make when responding
Arguing best interests to justify skipping consent
A response built on the claim that you knew what was best tells the reader your reasoning has not changed. Article 19 and the MOH guidelines leave little room for it outside emergencies.
Citing a rule from another country
Quoting the GMC, a US hospital policy or your training country's code signals that you have not read the Saudi rules that bind you. Cite the Law, the Regulations, the SCFHS Code and MOH policy.
Writing an essay on ethics
Principles help you understand the event; the response itself must stay with facts, impact and change.
Saying everyone in the department does the same
Common practice may point to a system problem worth fixing, but it is not a defence of your own conduct.
Using confidentiality to avoid answering
The investigating body is entitled to see relevant records, and the Law lets you use information to defend yourself against an accusation. Refusing without advice looks evasive.
Leaving out the patient
A statement that never mentions the patient's or family's experience reads as self-focused, however sincere it is.
Stopping at the certificate
Without a changed practice and evidence of it, a certificate shows only that you studied.
The rules this course works through
References are to the Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions and its Executive Regulations, the SCFHS Code of Ethics and national policy, as covered in the course.
- Art. 19
Consent to medical intervention
No intervention without the consent of the patient, or of a representative or guardian if the patient lacks legal capacity, except in emergencies to save life or an organ. The MOH guidelines add the age rules, written consent for higher-risk procedures and the two-specialist emergency rule.
In the course: Section 3 works through adults, minors, guardians, emergencies and refusal.
- Art. 21
Confidentiality
Information learned in practice is confidential; the file is open to the treating team, the patient and authorised bodies; disclosure is allowed only on the grounds the Law lists.
In the course: Section 4 sets this beside the PDPL and everyday pressures from families and insurers.
- Arts. 14-15
Certificates and reports
Diagnose with due care, issue reports, sick leave and death certificates according to the regulations, and never issue false sick leave or reports.
In the course: Section 6 covers certificates, records and corrections.
- Art. 12
Commissions and company benefits
No commissions or rewards for steering patients, and no benefits from drug or device companies. Breaches carry fines of up to SAR 50,000 under Article 29.
In the course: Section 7 sets this beside the SCFHS Code's chapter on financial affairs.
- Art. 10
Advertising and titles
No self-advertising except as the Regulations allow, and no titles or specialties you have not earned on signs, cards, prescriptions or adverts.
In the course: Section 7 includes the MOH enforcement cases from 2024 to 2026.
- DNR policy
Do-not-resuscitate status
Recommendation and signature by the attending consultant and two physicians of at least specialist level, review at least every six months for inpatients, and full continuing care.
In the course: Section 5 covers the policy and conversations with families.
Also relevant: Art. 5 and Reg. 3-5 on photographing procedures; Art. 8 on emergency care before payment; Art. 9 on working within your specialty; Art. 41 on compulsory malpractice insurance; SCFHS Code Ch. 4 (colleagues), Ch. 8 (teaching on patients) and Ch. 11 (research).
How this applies in each physician setting
Primary care and family medicineMOH primary health care centres and private polyclinics
Sick leave, certificates for employers and schools, family members attending with elderly patients and requests for referral to a particular hospital are daily pressure points. Short consultations make careful documentation of the reasons for each certificate more important.
Hospital medicine and critical careGovernment, military and private hospitals
DNR recommendations, conversations with large families, consent from guardians for adults without capacity and decisions about limiting escalation in intensive care are concentrated here. The national DNR policy and the hospital's own policy apply together.
Surgery and interventional specialtiesTheatres, endoscopy and catheter laboratories
Written signed consent is required for surgery, anaesthesia and interventional procedures, and most consent forms are valid for no more than 30 days. Photographing procedures for teaching or social media needs the patient's written consent and facility approval.
Paediatrics and obstetricsChildren's and maternity services
The age bands for consent, the role of guardians, joint consent from 15 to 18 and the MOH guidelines on reproductive procedures, which differ in places from the text of the SCFHS Code, are central. Check which rule your facility applies.
Residents and traineesSaudi Board and other training programmes
You work under supervision and are often the one taking consent. You must not work beyond your competence, must tell patients who you are and must keep honest training records. Your consultant remains responsible for supervision.
Private practice and aesthetic medicinePrivate clinics and day-surgery centres
Fees, packages, marketing, before-and-after images and referral arrangements bring Articles 10, 12 and 14 and the SCFHS Code's chapter on financial affairs into everyday decisions. MOH has acted against unsupported treatment claims online.
What happens after a complaint is made
A complaint about a physician's ethical conduct can start at the facility, through 937 or as a formal claim, and the route it takes depends on whether harm is alleged. The stages below describe the usual path as set out in the Law and its Executive Regulations.
Complaint or claim
A patient or family complains to the facility or through the MOH 937 service, or a person harmed (or their guardian or heirs) files a private claim with the facility or the regional health affairs director on the prescribed form.
Facility review
Many consent, communication and confidentiality complaints are first looked at by the facility, which may ask for your account and review the record. Facility procedures vary, so ask for the policy that applies to you.
Investigation
Where a formal investigation opens, the investigating body takes your statement and prepares a committee report. The Law expects the investigation to finish within 30 days, extendable once by 30 days. You may be barred from travel for 30 days, extendable by another 30, and you may object.
Referral or dismissal
If the evidence is insufficient, dismissal may be recommended. Otherwise the case goes to the Sharia Health Panel if it involves compensation, death or loss of an organ or its function, or to the Committee for Violations of the Law for other breaches, such as false certificates, advertising or referral commissions.
Hearing and decision
The Sharia Health Panel is chaired by a judge and includes physicians and a legal adviser; the public prosecutor represents the public right. The Violations Committee includes a legal specialist and a Saudi health professional. Notices are served through your employer, and electronic notices and hearings are allowed.
Appeal
Decisions of the Sharia Health Panel and the Violations Committee can be appealed to the Board of Grievances within 60 days of notification. A temporary suspension by the Minister can be appealed within 30 days.
Possible outcomes and what they mean for you
The penalties below are those set out in the Law. Which, if any, applies depends on the facts, and no course can decide or predict it.
| Outcome | What it is | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Dismissal or no action | The investigation finds the evidence insufficient or the complaint is resolved at facility level. | Most likely where the facts are clear, the issue was isolated and you had already addressed it. |
| Warning | A disciplinary penalty under Article 32. | Often seen where a consent or confidentiality decision was poorly handled but there is no pattern. |
| Fine | Up to SAR 10,000 as a disciplinary penalty (Art. 32); up to SAR 50,000 for breaches of Arts. 10, 12, 13 and listed parts of 14 (Art. 29); up to SAR 20,000 for other breaches (Art. 30). | False certificates, referral commissions and self-advertising fall within the higher band. |
| Compensation | Diya, arsh or other compensation set by the Sharia Health Panel where harm is proven. | Paid through compulsory malpractice insurance or by the employer, which is why insurer advice matters early. |
| Temporary suspension | The Minister may suspend a practitioner where there is evidence of a serious violation and risk to patients (Art. 39). | You cannot practise during the suspension; it can be appealed within 30 days. |
| Licence cancellation | Cancellation and removal from the register, with no new application for two years (Art. 32). | Reserved for the most serious conduct; because an MOH licence depends on SCFHS registration, it ends lawful practice. |
| Criminal penalty | For serious offences such as practising without a licence or misleading advertising: up to 6 months' imprisonment and/or up to SAR 100,000 (Art. 28). | Rare in ethics cases, but social media cases have also been referred under the Anti-Cybercrime Law. |
If you have been asked to complete education
Sometimes a facility, a head of department or a committee asks a physician to complete learning in ethics after a concern. If the request names a particular course, provider or format, only the body that made it can say whether this course meets it, so send the course outline, the number of sections, the knowledge checks and final assessment and the learning time to the person who set the requirement, and ask for written confirmation before you enrol.
After you finish, you will usually be asked for the certificate and a reflection. Use the reflective account template in the final section, link it to the specific concern, and keep a copy of everything you send with the date.
Using this course as CPD
SCFHS registration is renewed every two years, and CPD hours are checked at re-registration. SCFHS states 60 hours for doctors on its re-registration requirements page. If the hours are not completed, SCFHS renews for one year only, and that concession can be used once.
Hours from CPD activities registered with SCFHS inside the Kingdom normally appear in Mumaris Plus automatically. This course does not award SCFHS CPD hours. SCFHS decides how any learning counts towards your registration; you can apply through the Recognition of CPD Hours service on Mumaris Plus, which SCFHS lists at SAR 100 with a 30 business day service time, and SCFHS decides on relevance and depth for your field.
Whatever SCFHS decides about hours, a short written note on what you changed after the course is useful for appraisal, for your head of department and for any later question about your practice.
SCFHS registration renewal
This is the ethics course written only for physicians, and pairs with Professionalism and Professional Standards for Doctors in Saudi Arabia. The certificate records 3 hours; SCFHS decides how it counts towards your re-registration.
A 937 complaint or committee case
Most physician complaints involve consent, confidentiality, certificates or money. The course covers each and ends with an evidenced action plan. If your case is before a panel, add the Health Violations Committee course.
Key terms explained
- SCFHS
- The Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, which classifies and registers practitioners, publishes the Code of Ethics and runs Mumaris Plus.
- Mumaris Plus
- The SCFHS online platform for classification, registration, re-registration and recognition of CPD hours.
- Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions
- Royal Decree No. M/59 of 1426H with its Executive Regulations: the main statute on licensing, duties, liability and penalties for practitioners.
- Guardian (wali)
- The person who consents on behalf of a patient who lacks legal capacity, including a child under 15; from 15 to 18 the minor and guardian consent together.
- DNR order
- A medical decision, recorded on the hospital's form, that cardiopulmonary resuscitation will not be attempted; under the national policy it is recommended by three physicians.
- 937
- The MOH service centre and digital portal that records and follows up complaints about health services.
- Committee for Violations of the Law
- The body formed by ministerial decision that hears breaches of the Law other than malpractice claims.
- Sharia Health Panel
- The judge-chaired panel that hears compensation claims and cases involving death or loss of an organ or its function.
- Diya and arsh
- Forms of financial compensation for death or injury set under Islamic law and applied by the Sharia Health Panel.
- Board of Grievances
- The administrative court that hears appeals against panel and committee decisions and ministerial suspensions.
FAQالأسئلة الشائعة
Questions about this course
Will this course count towards my SCFHS CPD hours?
The course does not award SCFHS CPD hours. SCFHS decides how any learning counts towards your registration. You can apply through the Recognition of CPD Hours service on Mumaris Plus to have learning recognised, and SCFHS makes that decision on its own criteria.
Does it cover the MOH consent rules for minors and guardians?
Yes. Section 3 explains Article 19 of the Law and the MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent (2019): adulthood at 18, guardian consent under 15, joint consent from 15 to 18, the order of guardians for adults without capacity, the committee route when no guardian is available, and emergency treatment with two specialist physicians agreeing.
What does it teach about DNR orders?
Section 5 covers the Saudi Health Council's National Policy and Procedure for DNR Status: the attending consultant and two other physicians of at least specialist level must recommend and sign the order, inpatient orders are reviewed at least every six months, and care other than resuscitation continues. It also works through conversations with families who disagree.
Is it useful if I am facing a complaint or a committee?
Many physicians use structured ethics learning to understand the standard in question and to show reflection and change. Section 9 explains the Sharia Health Panel, the Committee for Violations of the Law and appeal periods. If a body has asked for specific training, only that body can say whether this course meets its requirement, so check with it, your insurer or your lawyer. The course can support your response but cannot decide any outcome.
I trained outside Saudi Arabia. Is the course suitable for me?
Yes. It highlights rules that often differ from other systems, such as written consent for interventional procedures, consent by adult women for themselves, the order of guardians, the three-physician DNR process, sick leave certification and the strict limits on self-promotion and company benefits.
Does it cover social media and advertising?
Yes. Section 7 covers Article 10 and Regulation 9-1 of the Law, the SCFHS Code's advertising rules and patient image rules, and MOH enforcement cases published between 2024 and 2026, with practical checks to use before posting.
How is the course assessed?
Each of the ten sections ends with a short knowledge check. The final assessment has 20 scenario-based questions, and you need 80% to pass. The last section guides you through a written reflection and a personal action plan.
How is this different from the professionalism course for doctors?
This course is about ethical decisions: consent, confidentiality, DNR, certificates and conflicts of interest. The professionalism course covers how you work: classification and licence scope, renewal, insurance, teamwork, supervision and online conduct. Many physicians take both.
Does it cover private practice alongside a government post?
Yes. Section 7 covers fees, private work alongside public duties, referral incentives and insurance claims, with the rules that apply to each.
Does it explain what to do when a family asks me not to tell the patient?
Section 2 covers the patient's right to know, a structure for serious news and how to respond when relatives ask you to hold information back.
Is this course only for doctors facing a complaint?
No. Many physicians take it as structured ethics learning before re-registration or when they start work in the Kingdom. The complaint and remediation sections are there because the same rules are applied when a concern is raised, and knowing them early helps you avoid one.
Does it cover the difference between the SCFHS Code and the MOH consent guidelines on reproductive procedures?
Yes. The SCFHS Code's text asks for the husband's agreement to reproductive procedures except in emergencies, while the MOH 2019 guidelines say a capable married patient consents for herself to permanent sterilisation and is asked to inform her spouse. The course explains both and advises you to check which rule your facility applies.
Can I use the reflective account in a statement to a committee?
You can use the template to prepare your thinking and adapt it for a statement, but show any document to your insurer or lawyer before you send it. Leave out anything that identifies the patient unless the body has asked for it.
How long does the course take?
It is designed as about 3 hours of study, but you can go at your own pace over your 12 months of access. Most physicians complete it over two or three sittings.
How this course is written and kept current
The course is written for Saudi practice from the Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions and its Executive Regulations as published by MOH, the SCFHS Code of Ethics, the MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent, the Saudi Health Council DNR policy, SDAIA guidance on the PDPL and MOH releases. Anything we could not confirm from a primary source has been left out rather than guessed.
Cases are illustrative and do not describe real patients or practitioners. When a law, code or policy changes, the affected lessons and questions are reviewed, and reported errors in legal or regulatory facts are corrected first.
Page updated 2 November 2026
Primary sources
The laws, codes and pages this page and the course rely on. Always check the current text with the issuing body.
- Law of Practicing Healthcare Professions (MOH English text)moh.gov.sa
- Executive Regulations of the Law (MOH, Arabic)moh.gov.sa
- SCFHS Code of Ethics for Healthcare Practitionersscfhs.org.sa
- MOH Saudi Guidelines for Informed Consent (2019)moh.gov.sa
- SCFHS re-registration requirementsscfhs.org.sa
- SCFHS Mumaris Plus FAQscfhs.org.sa
- MOH patient rightsmoh.gov.sa
- MOH 937 services (my.gov.sa)my.gov.sa
- SDAIA guide to the Personal Data Protection Lawdgp.sdaia.gov.sa
- MOH release on social media violations (November 2024)moh.gov.sa
Related courses
All coursesProfession-specific standards
Professionalism and Professional Standards for Doctors in Saudi Arabia
3 hoursClassification and licence scope, SCFHS renewal and 60 CME hours, malpractice insurance, multinational teamwork, resident supervision and social media rules for physicians in Saudi Arabia.
- SCFHS classification, Seha licence and privileges
- Re-registration, CME hours and Article 41 cover
- Resident supervision and multinational teamwork
SAR 279Add to cartView courseArticle 19 and the MOH 2019 consent guidelines in practice: capacity, guardians, minors 15 to 18, emergencies, refusal, interpreters, witnesses and form validity.
- Article 19 and the MOH 2019 consent guidelines
- Joint consent for minors aged 15 to 18
- Two-specialist emergencies and 30-day form validity
SAR 229Add to cartView courseConsent, privacy and communication
Patient Confidentiality and PDPL Course for Healthcare Practitioners
2 hoursArticle 21, the SCFHS Code and the PDPL applied to records access, family requests, lawful disclosure, messaging apps, patient images and breaches in Saudi practice.
- Article 21 and the confidential medical file
- Health data as sensitive data under the PDPL
- WhatsApp groups, patient images and breaches
SAR 229Add to cartView course
Start today, finish at your own pace
Instant access after checkout. 3 hours of learning, on any device, with your certificate and reflective account the day you pass.